Genuine Progress for Australia - Adopting the GPI
- Richard
- 7 hours ago
- 7 min read
Australia stands at an economic crossroads. As technological change accelerates, particularly with rapid advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and automation, our current systems for measuring progress are beginning to show their age. The ongoing reliance on Gross Domestic Product (GDP) as the main indicator of national success is increasingly challenged by those advocating for a more holistic model—one that accounts for well-being, environmental sustainability, and the distribution of prosperity. The Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI) has emerged on the global stage as a promising alternative, but why should Australia consider formal adoption, especially now? This post explores the compelling reasons for Australian policymakers, businesses, and communities to embrace GPI, examines barriers and opportunities unique to our nation, and argues that the time for change is now.
The GDP Problem: Growth Isn’t Everything
Since its development in the 1930s, GDP has reigned as the gold standard for tracking national economic progress. Its appeal is understandable: GDP is simple, well-recognised, and easy to compare internationally. However, as many economists and social scientists have warned, GDP measures activity, not well-being. Pollution cleanups, disaster relief efforts, and resource depletion all add to GDP, even as they constitute social or ecological losses. Unpaid work, volunteerism, and leisure—core contributors to community well-being—are ignored.
The disconnect is glaring in an era of AI and automation. Machines increasingly perform routine and cognitive tasks, shifting the nature of work fundamentally. As the number of traditional jobs fluctuates, wages may stagnate, but overall productivity could soar. GDP, for all its focus on output, fails to account for who benefits from these changes, who is left behind, and what costs—environmental or social—they impose. In Australia, record highs in GDP have coincided with rising inequality, ecological stress, and a mental health crisis. Clearly, there is more to national progress than what GDP can reveal.
GPI: A Holistic Approach to Measuring Progress
The Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI) is anchored in a simple but revolutionary idea: measure not just economic output, but the “true” contributions to well-being and sustainability. GPI starts with personal consumption, adjusts for income distribution, and properly accounts for costs like crime, loss of leisure, resource depletion, and pollution. It also adds value for positive contributions such as volunteer work and household labor—areas Australia excels in yet rarely gets credit for in economic policy circles.
GPI provides:
- A balanced account of economic, social, and environmental progress.
- Insights into the long-term sustainability of growth.
- Tools for policy adaptation in an age of rapid technological change.
Internationally, pilot efforts in Nova Scotia, Maryland, and Vermont show how GPI can guide policy more effectively than GDP alone. These regions have used GPI to redirect budgets, drive sustainable development, and build stronger communities. Australia, with its unique economy, vast natural resources, and world-class research capabilities, should lead in this global transformation.
Why GPI Is Urgent in the Age of AI and Automation
AI and automation bring both enormous promise and serious peril. According to recent studies, up to 40% of Australian jobs could be impacted by automation over the next two decades. For many, this signals unbridled efficiency and productivity. But what happens to social cohesion, mental health, and the environment if the gains are not shared? If displaced workers cannot find new purpose or support? If resource use and emissions continue unchecked?
GPI is uniquely suited to track these consequences. It measures the health of communities, the quality of social connectedness, and the sustainability of resource use—all outcomes AI and automation might affect, for better or worse. Policy guided by GPI could steer technological advancement toward inclusiveness, support upskilling and re-training, and ensure that environmental costs are not swept under the rug of “growth.”
Barriers to GPI Adoption in Australia
Adopting GPI is not without challenges. Key barriers include:
Political inertia: GDP is deeply embedded in Australian policy and public consciousness. Shifting to GPI demands visionary leadership and tireless advocacy.
Methodological inconsistency: GPI lacks global standardisation. That makes benchmarking across states or internationally difficult—though efforts for “GPI 2.0” are making progress in refining these methodologies.
Subjectivity: Assigning values to unpaid work, environmental loss, or leisure introduces unavoidable judgment calls. Some economists resist these “soft” measures and question the reliability of GPI.
Data limitations: Australia does not yet systematically collect all the social and environmental data GPI requires. Improving data infrastructure is a must.
Complexity: GPI calculations require more inputs and expertise than GDP. But in a world awash with big data and advanced analytics, is this still a convincing objection?
Federal system: Australia’s states and territories have varied priorities and capacity for change, which make unified adoption complex.
Low public awareness: Most Australians do not know what GPI is, let alone its advantages over GDP.
Overcoming the Barriers: Opportunities Unique to Australia
Despite these hurdles, Australia has unique opportunities:
World-Class Data Capacity
Australian government departments and universities are global leaders in data science and social research. The rise of AI means our ability to gather, process, and analyse complex data is better than ever. This creates an environment ripe for implementing a robust GPI.
Policy Innovation at State Level
States such as South Australia and Tasmania have a history of piloting new social and environmental initiatives before national adoption. GPI could be trialled regionally, building capacity and demonstrating results before a nationwide rollout.
Growing Demand for Accountability
Australians are increasingly aware of issues such as climate change, mental health, and inequality. Businesses and government agencies alike are under pressure to demonstrate their commitment to community wellbeing, not just profit maximisation.
Collaboration Potential
Australia collaborates with countries and regions already implementing GPI. We can learn from—and improve on—their experiences.
Education and Engagement
Australia’s extensive public and private education infrastructure enables rapid public awareness campaigns. Civic groups, universities, business leaders, and creative communities can champion GPI and educate stakeholders over time.
How GPI Addresses AI and Automation’s Challenges
The rise of AI and automation is not simply a technical shift—it’s a social and ethical one. GPI addresses several challenges:
- Changing value of work: As machines do more, unpaid and nontraditional work will become more important. GPI recognises these sectors, supporting policy that values care, creativity, and community service.
- Income inequality: AI can concentrate wealth. GPI’s adjustment for income distribution puts equity on the policy agenda.
- Environment and sustainability: Automation can increase resource efficiency but also raise consumption and waste. GPI’s focus on ecological impact is essential for guiding “green automation.”
- Mental health and social cohesion: Displacement and rapid change can hurt mental health. GPI includes leisure, mental well-being, and community connections.
- Policy response: Politicians and policymakers using GPI can anticipate and address disruptions before they become crises.
International Experience: Lessons for Australia
Regions that have pursued GPI offer lessons for Australia:
- Nova Scotia: Used GPI to redirect investment from simply economic expansion to social and ecological health, with significant improvements in community wellbeing and sustainability.
- Maryland: Integrated GPI into state planning, budget decisions, and public reporting, demonstrating that alternative indicators could drive effective government.
- Vermont: GPI helped shape environmental policy, leading to measurable improvements in forest conservation and health outcomes.
- Bhutan: Although it uses Gross National Happiness, its philosophy aligns with GPI: psychological wellbeing, ecological diversity, and equitable development are prioritised.
Australia can build on these experiences, adapting their successes and avoiding their missteps.
The Case for GPI in Australia
Let’s articulate why Australia, at this moment in time, should shift to measuring progress with GPI.
1. GPI Reflects What Australians Value
Australia’s way of life—social mobility, mateship, access to nature, and the importance of fair play—is poorly assessed by GDP alone. GPI incorporates these values directly into the measures of national success.
2. Policy Guidance in Times of Change
As AI and automation reshape society, GPI gives policymakers tools to respond to displacement, shifts in education needs, and environmental stress. It provides early warning signals missing from GDP metrics.
3. Better Resource Allocation
GPI reveals when economic “gains” are balanced or outweighed by social and ecological costs. This enables smarter spending and investment, focusing on long-term prosperity rather than short-term growth.
4. Strengthening Social Fabric
Recognising diverse forms of work, community volunteering, and civic participation strengthens the social fabric, a bulwark against isolation and inequality.
5. Environmental Stewardship
Australia is home to unique ecosystems, vast natural resources, and ongoing climate risk. GPI’s inclusion of ecological variables supports policy to safeguard these assets for future generations.
6. Competitive Advantage
Pioneering GPI allows Australia to lead globally as sustainability and wellbeing become central to economic and trade discussions. Investors, talent, and citizens increasingly seek places that prioritise more than just growth.
7. Public Ownership and Trust
Relying on GDP alone erodes trust when people see record profits alongside growing hardship. GPI restores ownership of national progress to citizens, transparently linking well-being with economic policy.
Recommendations: Charting Australia’s Path Forward
If Australia pursues GPI adoption, several strategic steps are needed:
1. Pilot Studies: Begin with state-level implementation, using robust methodology and public engagement.
2. Standardisation: Work with international experts to develop clear, replicable GPI methodologies that address Australian priorities.
3. Data Infrastructure: Invest in national data systems to collect, process, and share social and environmental information.
4. Education Campaigns: Raise public and policymaker awareness about GPI’s benefits, costs, and implications.
5. Political Vision: Encourage bipartisan support and creative leadership. Frame GPI adoption as a commitment to genuine progress for all Australians.
6. Integration: Use GPI alongside GDP for a transition period, phasing in broader adoption as data systems and understanding mature.
7. International Partnerships: Collaborate globally to improve comparability and to learn from best practices.
Conclusion: Toward Genuine Progress in an Automated Age
The metrics we choose to measure success shape our actions and priorities as a nation. GDP, for all its utility, is no longer sufficient to guide Australia through the sweeping changes posed by AI and automation. The Genuine Progress Indicator reflects what matters most: our collective wellbeing, the health of our environment, and the fair distribution of opportunity. If Australia acts now to adopt GPI, leveraging its data capabilities, policy innovation, and commitment to social equity, it can foster a future that is inclusive, sustainable, and truly prosperous. The world is watching, and Australia has the chance to lead.
It’s time to demand more from our measures—because genuine progress means moving forward without leaving anyone, or anything, behind.
🌏