UK High Court Holds BHP Liable Over Brazil Dam Catastrophe

The High Court of England and Wales has found mining giant BHP Billiton liable for the 2015 collapse of the Fundão Dam in Mariana, Brazil, which killed dozens of people and triggered one of the worst environmental disasters in South America. The decision, delivered in November 2025 by Justice Finola O’Farrell in Municipio de Mariana v BHP Group (UK) Ltd and BHP Group Ltd, marks a historic moment in international environmental accountability.

Why the Case Was Heard in the UK

Although the dam collapse occurred in Brazil, the claimants brought the case before the English High Court rather than Brazilian courts. BHP is a dual-listed company based in London and Melbourne, making its UK operations subject to English law. Communities affected by the disaster argued that BHP’s UK parent company failed to prevent foreseeable harm through inadequate supervision and corporate governance.

Brazilian legal proceedings had already faced delays and enforcement limits, leaving many victims without redress. The English court accepted jurisdiction, ruling that management decisions and oversight lapses in the UK played a crucial role in the disaster and could therefore be judged domestically. The decision underlines that parent companies can be held responsible for harm caused by their global subsidiaries when negligence originates at the corporate level.

The Collapse and Its Consequences

The Fundão tailings dam, jointly operated by BHP and Vale through their Samarco venture, collapsed in November 2015, releasing millions of cubic meters of toxic mining waste. In fact, the catastrophe released between 40-55 million cubic meters of liquefied iron ore tailings into the surrounding environment.

The resulting wave of sludge destroyed nearby villages, killed at least 19 people, polluted rivers for hundreds of kilometers, and caused long-term environmental damage across two Brazilian states. Scientists have since found residual heavy metals and toxins in river sediments, threatening farmland, fish stocks, and human health years later.

Credit: https://iclg.com/news

The Court’s Findings

Justice Finola O’Farrell held that BHP owed a duty of care to prevent foreseeable harm to communities downstream and breached that duty by not ensuring adequate dam safety and risk management. The verdict opens the path to compensation for more than 700,000 claimants, including residents, municipalities, and businesses affected by the collapse. Damages are expected to reach billions of pounds, reflecting both environmental remediation and economic loss.

The figure of 32 billion US Dollars is for the main comprehensive settlement reached between BHP, Vale, Samarco, Brazilian authorities, and public defenders in October 2024. This US$32 billion (R$170 billion) agreement is meant to cover environmental repairs, community compensation, infrastructure, and restoration measures in Brazil related to the Fundão Dam disaster.​

However, the UK High Court group action represents additional potential liability (up to £36 billion or about $45–48 billion USD), but any compensation ordered through the UK courts will likely be adjusted to account for amounts already paid under the Brazilian settlement, and the final payout will depend on future legal proceedings.

Credit: https://discoveryalert.com.au

Global Reaction and Significance

Community leaders across Brazil hailed the ruling as a long-awaited step toward justice, describing it as recognition that global corporations cannot evade responsibility through complex international structures. Environmental lawyers called it a breakthrough that may influence future cross-border litigation and redefine how multinationals handle environmental risk.

BHP issued a statement expressing condolences to those affected and said it would review the decision with its legal advisers. The company reaffirmed its commitment to safety and sustainable resource management.

The court’s decision sends a strong message to the global mining and extractive industries: accountability for environmental harm extends beyond borders, and parent companies must ensure that oversight, safety, and governance obligations are enforced wherever they operate.